Methodology: Collecting and Analyzing Data ( Reading Literacy)

To aid you prepare Think about the grounds you calm, why you chose those feature grounds, and your grounds collation modees, including how you used collaboration in your mode.   · After analyzing your grounds, invent a visual justice of the dissection of the grounds. This can be in the shape of graphs, tables, and/or charts.    Assignment: Write 1 page for Keep-apart F and Keep-apart G using APA diction and reference Part F:  Methodology: Collecting Grounds : Write 1 page Answer & Respond to the following:  · What grounds did you convene, and which pre-approved grounds collation tools did you use? · Why did you adopt these feature grounds collation tools? Collect a rationale for their use. · What mode or steps did you conduct in conveneing your grounds? Describe these steps in specialty. · Was the grounds you calm shapeative, summative, or twain? · How did collaboration delay colleagues in maneuvering and/or implementing your grounds modees/tools contact your discovery? For illustration, what strategies did the collaborative stakeholders distribute that you used?  What ideas did they distribute to better enlist and/or motivate wards? In what areas did they collect subsistence in aiding your order better? How did the collaboration convey new insights, notification, and ideas to aiding you reresolve your fix and to decorous your education and ward scholarship? · How did the product of the timeline tend to the overall prosperity of this keep-akeep-apart of the implementation view? Part G:  Methodology: Analyzing and Graphing Grounds Using Triangulation: (Write 1 page) Answer & Respond to the following: · How did you use the triangulation mode to excite the multiple pieces of grounds? · How did the visual justices back in analyzing the grounds? · What did the grounds expose? · Did the grounds aid you tally your discovery scrutiny(s)? Why or why not? · What did the grounds expose about pedagogue usage and ward scholarship? · How did your dissection parallel to the discovery findings from your scholarship criticism? Do the results of your dissection subsistence your scholarship criticism? In what ways? Or, why not? What does this moderation to you in your biased educational setting? (Review assignment devotion & observation Scholarship Criticism and Revised discovery scrutiny drain)