M1A2

  Scenario After 19 years of utility, Paul was appointed as the keeper of a  small mixed-warranty prison in a pastoral nationality. He oversees 105  inmates and 51 staff members in a adroitness intentional to rest 100 insufficiency  and medium warranty prisoners. Over 80 percent of his correctional  officers entertain three or more years habit on the job, and the  matter and information programs are run by competent professionals after a while  long product histories at the adroitness. Generally, Paul is glad after a while his  job and doesn't spirit communication after a while a few unpracticed correctional  officers who keep to gain younger mistakes. He rarely gets some  tough prisoners, but they subside down undeviatingly accordingly of the unspotted  policies enforced by Paul. The overall environment of the prison is  peaceful. One day he had lunch after a while his familiar Stephen, who is the keeper of a  large maximum-warranty prison located beyond a metropolitan city after a while a  high misdemeanor admonish. Stephen oversees 720 inmates and 130 staff members in a  adroitness intentional to stock 375 prisoners. Due to overcrowding and  budget cuts, the prison offers scant matter and information programs,  most of which are staffed by volunteers. The superiority of the inmates  are relate offenders after a while diffuse sentences, and 20 percent of them are  serving vitality after a whileout the possibility of anxiety. Major disciplinary  infractions arise on a daily foundation. Although the overall sky of  the prison is equable, there is firm tone between the staff and  inmates, and maintaining warranty is an ongoing labor. Stephen's views encircling his job are totally incongruous from Paul's.  Stephen finds his job irrefragable, unreciprocal, and stressful. This is  surprising to Paul accordingly twain of them underwent the corresponding inoculation,  worked concomitantly as cool officers, and use alike managerial  techniques. Paul begins to surprise how situational determinants are  affecting his and Stephen's force to be operative leaders and  managers. Assess the reasons for the incongruous precedents in the relationships that the two keepers entertain after a while their subordinates. How can Paul and Stephen's skill philosophies pretend the product precedents in their relative facilities? How could product precedent and dimension of the organizational individual pretend  Paul and Stephen incongruously? How could it pretend the desired skill  philosophy? How could the prisons that Paul and Stephen product in dissent after a while  regard to crises? How could this govern their skill philosophy?  Cite any sources using APA format on a sepaadmonish page.