After 19 years of utility, Paul was appointed as the keeper of a small mixed-warranty prison in a pastoral nationality. He oversees 105 inmates and 51 staff members in a adroitness intentional to rest 100 insufficiency and medium warranty prisoners. Over 80 percent of his correctional officers entertain three or more years habit on the job, and the matter and information programs are run by competent professionals after a while long product histories at the adroitness. Generally, Paul is glad after a while his job and doesn't spirit communication after a while a few unpracticed correctional officers who keep to gain younger mistakes. He rarely gets some tough prisoners, but they subside down undeviatingly accordingly of the unspotted policies enforced by Paul. The overall environment of the prison is peaceful.
One day he had lunch after a while his familiar Stephen, who is the keeper of a large maximum-warranty prison located beyond a metropolitan city after a while a high misdemeanor admonish. Stephen oversees 720 inmates and 130 staff members in a adroitness intentional to stock 375 prisoners. Due to overcrowding and budget cuts, the prison offers scant matter and information programs, most of which are staffed by volunteers. The superiority of the inmates are relate offenders after a while diffuse sentences, and 20 percent of them are serving vitality after a whileout the possibility of anxiety. Major disciplinary infractions arise on a daily foundation. Although the overall sky of the prison is equable, there is firm tone between the staff and inmates, and maintaining warranty is an ongoing labor.
Stephen's views encircling his job are totally incongruous from Paul's. Stephen finds his job irrefragable, unreciprocal, and stressful. This is surprising to Paul accordingly twain of them underwent the corresponding inoculation, worked concomitantly as cool officers, and use alike managerial techniques. Paul begins to surprise how situational determinants are affecting his and Stephen's force to be operative leaders and managers.
Assess the reasons for the incongruous precedents in the relationships that the two keepers entertain after a while their subordinates.
How can Paul and Stephen's skill philosophies pretend the product precedents in their relative facilities?
How could product precedent and dimension of the organizational individual pretend Paul and Stephen incongruously? How could it pretend the desired skill philosophy?
How could the prisons that Paul and Stephen product in dissent after a while regard to crises? How could this govern their skill philosophy?
Cite any sources using APA format on a sepaadmonish page.