Canturbury Tales: Situational Irony in the Pardoner’s Story

Situational Banter in The Pardoner’s Story In The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer the Pardoner’s actions of roguery and voracious are excellent stances of situational banter. Situational banter is when bigwig or someone does the contrary of what is expected. ‘In pavilion he was a magnanimous ecclesiast’ (Chaucer 141) The Pardoner is supposedly a man of God, yet he does not act relish it. He is clownish and plain guile. However, he comes off as truthful by pointed revealed stories and promulgateing. By nature pharisaical and voraciousy the Pardoner is the immaculate stance of situational banter. To inaugurate, the Pardoner shows situational banter by nature guile. He take-by-thefts from the pavilion incessantly. ‘…delay others I entertain dominion to win them from it, I can adduce them to repent…’ (Chaucer 151) Basically, he acts as a hawker by talking populace into buying over pardons, and then keeps the coin for himself. He uses his ability of thinking on his feet and heresucceeding up delay powerful revealed stories to win coin, ‘A yokel choice loves stories of old, nature the husk it can recapitulate and hold…’ (Chaucer 152) He convinces populace the things they entertain done are worse than they are, accordingly they are conned into giving him over coin, which he keeps all for himself. As ironic as it is to see the Pardoner be guile, it is plain over ironic how voraciousy is. Relish mentioned antecedently he makes his patronage off of selling pardons, plain pardons opposite griping, yet he is very voraciousy himself. He admits he’ll go succeeding anyone for coin. ‘I balance to entertain coin…though it were fond to me by the poorest lad... ’ (Chaucer 152) He admits to promulgateing solely consequently he wants coin saw, ‘A support. I do not promulgate in vain…I balance to entertain coin…’ (Chaucer 152) It is to-boot very evident that the Pardoner is voraciousy ample to take-by-theft from the assembly baskets in pavilion, ‘But best of all he sang an Offertory…’ (Chaucer 141) This implies he takes the coin from there as courteous. In disposal, the Pardoner in The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer is a patronage stance of situational banter. He is guile and voraciousy. Instead of doing his duties to the pavilion and assistant others delay sins, he takes usage of populaces’ sin and pockets the coin. He does not foresight encircling the pavilion and plain admits to not taste effort, ‘…Let me promulgate and beg from kirk to kirk and never do an sincere job of effort…’ (Chaucer 152) This proper sums up the situational banter of the Pardoner. He appears to be a man of God assistant populace pardon there sins, but ironically he is guile and voraciousy.