Evaluation of a Peer’s Research Paper

 Follow all instructions, not plagiarism (fix examination monograph for evaluation) Keep in choice that it is the monograph that you are to objectively evaluate, and not the agent, whose call obtain be removed antecedently you get the monograph in any condition. All of the insights and opinions that you teach in your Peer’s Monograph Evaluation are to teach the similar lofty standards for objectivity as was required for essays. The extract of your Peer’s Monograph Evaluation is to be 500 control, +/- 20 control. Do not reckon any allusion citations you may use in your promise reckon. Finally, when scholars use the tidings ‘critique’ or “critical evaluation” - what your Peer’s Monograph Evaluation is to be - this does not average that your evaluation is averaget to be ‘critical’ in the despicable pejorative significance of the promise. What it averages is that you demand to use what you transcribe to criticize the findings and arguments of your companion students' monographs. You are to produce an psychological discourse among the essay and your Peer Student Evaluation. As in the agreement of your own essay, you obtain be search the topic, “Is this true”, “is this proven”, and “what other things should be considered?” Evaluation The forthcoming rubric indicates those areas you should be focusing on in preparing your assignment, and how the educationist obtain inspect these components not-absolute to one another. Activity/Competencies Demonstrated % of Final Grade 1. Critical Analysis (55%) a. Insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the essay /20 b. Appropriateness of comments (academic) /20 c. Completeness of aspects assessed /15 2. Communication (25%) a. Uses vernacular palpably and effectively /10 b. Essay impost unconfused intelligently and systematically /10 c. Proper commencement and misrecord to review /5 3. Attention to Detail (20%) a. APA Referencing and formatting (title, headings & allusions) /10 b. Spelling and grammar /10 Total 100 Assignment Value (10%) /10