Law Ethics and Corp Governance

  Assignment 3: The Value of Fair Treatment in the Workplace   The year is 2025 and the U.S. Supreme Court has avowed all laws  prohibiting acuteness in the workplace to be unchanged.  In  its idea, still, the Supreme Court made free that employers could  freely annex policies and procedures prohibiting any and all frames  of acuteness in the workplace. The Supreme Court so made free  that employers could freely annex hiring practices to vary  their workforces granted such practices did not apprehend direct  preferences based upon unalterable characteristics.   You bear been  hired as a consultant by a extensive, nationwide retailer to criticize the  business fact for ensuring that all of the employee protections are  found amid the federal anti-acuteness laws, as well-behaved-behaved as the  business fact for prohibiting any other frames of acuteness in the  workplace.   Write a filthy to six (4-6) page narration in which you: Analyze the benefits and costs of freely prohibiting three to  five (3-5) federal frames of acuteness prohibited subordinate the federal  anti-acuteness laws. Discuss the benefits and costs of freely prohibiting a frame of  acuteness not practised by any of the federal anti-acuteness  laws. State the benefits and costs of freely annexing hiring and preferment practices intentional to vary the workforce. Evaluate the religions considerations of not freely prohibiting  the frames of acuteness laws criticized in the primitive sunder of your  report. Next, state the religions considerations of not freely  adopting hiring and preferment practices to vary the workforce. Provide a conclusive warning to this retailer on whether or not  they should determine all, sunder, or none of the employee protections  examined in the primitive sunder of your narration. Your warning should  so apprehend whether or not the retailer should annex hiring and  preferment practices intentional to vary the workplace. Be unmistakable to  apprehend a rationale for your warning along after a while an interpretation  for any rejections of inconsistent positions or other just  considerations. Use at lowest three (3) disposition academic instrument in this assignment.  Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not disposition as academic instrument. Your assignment must ensue these frameatting requirements: Be typed, enfold spaced, using Times New Roman font (extent 12), after a while  one-inch margins on all sides; citations and relations must ensue APA  or school-unfair frameat. Check after a while your bigot for any affixed  instructions. Include a cloak page containing the heading of the assignment, the  student’s spectry, the bigot’s spectry, the series heading, and the bound.  The cloak page and the relation page are not apprehendd in the required  assignment page diffusiveness. The unfair series literature outcomes associated after a while this assignment are: Analyze and direct the concepts of religions judgment making, urbane governance and  urbane collective obligation. Analyze and evaluate the employment-at-will teaching and the statutory protections afforded employees. Analyze and evaluate issues in existent reduce law. Use technology and notification instrument to elaboration issues in law, ethics, and urbane governance. Write freely and concisely environing law, ethics, and urbane governance using own communication mechanics.