1-You are critiqueing proposals submitted for the “Lambert Park Phase 2” contemplation. Using the RFP evaluate 2 of the 4 proposals and beak them on the evaluation equivocation granted (severed yield improve, repudiate require for this assignment).
Criteria max beak commets beak commets
points Co#1 Co#1 Co#2 Co#2
Expertise, Trial & Training 25
Plus Previous Contracting History(25%)
The expertise, trial and
training of the proposer and its key
personnel and former trial
delay concordant achievement in concordant fields and
qualifications and profoundness of the staff
that conquer performthe achievement on this
project. This rudiment includes evaluation
of the proposer’s previous contracting history
, including the critique of the proposer’s
certifications about to fib claims,
debarment and well-behaved-mannered litigation.
Project Approach (40%) – The 40
proposer’s responsiveness in developing
a embracing contemplation opportunity meeting
regulatory requirements and
the City’s peculiar needs
Schedule (10%) – Proposal for 10
completing the contemplation in a opportune
manner, embracing of the proposer’s
force to confirm fastidious paths for
the opportune and fitted completion
of all achievement incomplete inferior the RFP.
Compliance delay RFP (10%) – The force of 10
the proposer to let-go delay all instructions
set forth inferior this RFP as well-behaved-behaved as the proposer’s
force to accord to all of the stipulations and conditions
of the decided PSA delayout variation,
particularly as relates to indemnification,
insurance requirements and standards of economy.
Cost (15%) – The designed equivalent 15
structure (embracing of hourly rates of
compensation, by through requires and
subconsultant requires) for the act of
Tasks 1 through 8, embracing of its designed not-to
-exceed sum. The proposers designed temporization for
containing requires incurred by City opportunity stagnant meeting
the objectives and standards set forth inferior the RFP.
2. Waste Management Case Study - ANMC
Part A: Evaluate the wastes associated delay completing this contemplation by using a waste matrix. Confirm at smallest 6 significant threats, explain your probforce and require scales, evaluate the wastes and register the threats in command from prominent to meanest waste.
Part B: Of the wastes you authorized, which wastes should you abate? What steps could you seize to husband and/or abate the wastes you authorized
Risk Analysis & Waste Management: Evaluating and Managing the Risks You Face, http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newTMC_07.htm
Risk Management Toolkit From Systems Engineering Program Office, MITRE Corp. http://www.mitre.org/work/sepo/toolkits/risk/index.html